Methodology
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Introduction
- Setting the Stage
- Testing Increases
- Slow Progress Online
- Effect of No Child Left Behind
- Changes Afoot
- High Stakes in High School
- Online Growth in Formative Assessment
- Table 1.1:NCLB Testing Requirements
Chapter 2: Industry Size and Structure
- Industry Size
- Largest Segment Is High-Stakes Summative Testing
- Classroom Assessment Is Fastest-Growing Segment
- Players in the Assessment Market
- Mergers and Acquisitions Activity
- Table 2.1: Testing Segment Market Share of Instructional Media in U.S. Classrooms, 2007-2008P
- Table 2.2: PreK-12 Testing Terminology
- Table 2.3: Simba Information’s Testing M&A Index, 2007
Chapter 3: Statewide Testing
- Introduction
- Increase in Customization
- Costs Temper Customization
- High-Stakes Growth Areas
- Changes Under Way in High School Testing
- States Moving to End-of-Course Exams
- High School-College Connection
- Continued Growth in Exit Exams
- Second-Chance Testing
- Expansion Room: Alternative Assessments
- Expansion Room: ELL Assessments
- State Contracts Concentrated with PEM
- CTB Captures Most Testing Contracts in 2007
- Table 3.1: Statewide Testing Market, 2007-2008P
- Table 3.2: Statewide Testing Contracts Held by Market Leaders, 2007
- Table 3.3: Simba Information’s Testing Contract Index, 2007
Chapter 4: Classroom and District Testing
Chapter 5: Emerging Trends in Testing
- NCLB Reauthorization Prospects
- Growth Models
- NAEP and the Issue of Common Standards
- Multi-State Consortia
- Corporate Alliances
- Funding Trends
- Enrollment Trends
- LA Has Twice the Number of ELL Students as Any Other District
- NYC Leads in Students with IEPS
- Table 5.1: NAEP Under No Child Left Behind
- Table 5.2: Department of Education State Assessments, FY2006-2008
- Table 5.3: Funding for Statewide Testing, Federal vs. State Sources
- Table 5.4: Total Public/Private Projected K-12 Enrollment, 2007-2015
- Table 5.5: 10 Districts with Highest Number of LEP/ELL Students, 2005-2006
- Table 5.6: 10 Districts with Highest Number of IEP Students, 2005-2006
Chapter 6: Online Testing
- Market Size and Structure
- Infrastructure and Funding Issues
- ‘Online by ’09’ Still Offline in Minnesota
- Online Does Not Necessarily Cost Less
- The Oregon Story
- Driving Forces: From Cost to Faster Results
- Publishers Working to Maximize Effectiveness in Online Environment
- Emerging High-Stakes Sectors for Online
- Formative Assessment Potential
- Georgia’s OAS
- Case Study: Virginia
- Case Study: Minnesota
- Wireless Handheld Options
- Penetration of Wireless Handhelds
- Table 6.1: Computer Access and Computer-Based Assessment
Chapter 7: Forecast and Conclusions
- Robust Growth for Formative Assessment
- Table 7.1: U.S. Testing Market, 2007-2011P
Chapter 8: Who’s Who
- American Institutes for Research
- CTB/McGraw-Hill
- Data Recognition Corp.
- Educational Testing Service
- eInstruction
- Measured Progress
- Measurement Inc.
- Pearson Educational Measurement
- Questar Assessment Inc.
- Qwizdom
- Riverside Publishing
- Scantron
- Vantage Learning
- Wireless Generation