PreK-12 Special Education Market Forecast 2010 : Simba Information

PreK-12 Special Education Market Forecast 2010

Jul 21, 2010
213 Pages - Pub ID: CURP2523094

Ask a question about this report

Email a colleague

Printer format

Order by fax

Description

Table of Contents

Search Inside Report

Table of Contents
Methodology
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Special Education Market Size and Structure: Introduction; Special Education is Not Homogeneous; Response to Intervention Emerges; RtI Gives New Meaning to Grouping; RtI Case Study Missouri; RtI Case Study Boston Public Schools; RtI Case Study: Mobile County, Ala., Public Schools; State’s Use of RtI Varies; Early Intervention Services; Services in the Least Restrictive Environment; Universal Design for Learning Opens Access; Focus on Prevention through Intervention; 9% of 3-21 Population Has Special Needs; Table 1.1: Impact of RtI on Special Education Referrals, 2009; Table 1.2: Children Served Under IDEA, Part B, 2003-2008; Table 1.3: Public PreK-12 Students Served Under IDEA, Part B, by Age and Disability Category, Fall 2007
Chapter 2: Policy, Legislation and Funding: Introduction; IDEA Is Major Federal Policy Setter; NCLB Had Dramatic Effect on Special Education; NIMAS Aims to Improve Access to Instructional Materials; Update on Several State Initiatives in Special Education; Per Student Costs Increase in Special Education; IDEA is Primarily Channel for Federal Special Education Funding; Other Federal Programs Help RtI as Well; State and Local Funding Is Main Support for Special Education; Table 2.1: Federal IDEA Funding, FY 2009-FY 2011P; Table 2.2: Federal Grants to States for Special Education, FY 2011P; Table 2.3: IDEA ARRA State Grant Spending by State; PreK-12 Special Education Market Forecast 2010
Chapter 3: Special Education in Schools: Simba Information/MDR Survey Results: Introduction; Schools Trying to Mainstream Special Needs Students; Use of RtI Increases in 2009-2010; Most Frequently Used Instructional Materials; Intrest in Technology, But Not Integral Use…Yet; Paper and Pencil Predominate for Assessment; Table 3.1: Growth in Special Needs Students, 2010 vs. 2009; Table 3.2: Change in Students Receiving RtI Support 2010 vs. 2009; Table 3.3: Most Often Used Devices and Instructional Materials, 2009-2010; Table 3.4: Comparison of Instructional Materials as to Provide Effect in Special Education; Table 3.5: Comparison of Instructional Materials as to Positive Effect in RtI; Table 3.6: Time Spent Working on Computers; Table 3.7: Free Web Resources Used to Supplement Core Programs; Table 3.8: Most Frequently Used for Assessment in Special Education and RtI _57
Chapter 4: Instructional Materials and Assessments: Introduction; Niches for Special Education Materials; Special Education Incorporates Formative Assessment; Publishers Providing Professional Development; Multi-Pronged Opportunity for Technology; RtI and Special Education Attract a Variety of Publishers; Special Education Materials Market Grows 2.6%; Purchasing Process and Decision-Makers; Table 4.1: Selected Special Education Curriculum Material Categories; Table 4.2: Selected Publishers and Products; Table 4.3: Sales of Special Education Print and Electronic Media to the U.S. PreK-12 School Market, 2009-2011P; Table 4.4: Sales of Special Education Materials by Level, 2010; Table 4.5: Funding Sources, Special Education Materials, 2010; Table 4.6: Comparing RtI Expenditure to Special Education Expenditure; Table 4.7: Who Initiated RtI Implementation; Table 4.8: District RtI Leaders
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Outlook: Introduction; What Educators are Looking for in Devices and Materials; Growth Areas for Special Education Include Autism and ADHD; Best Practices for Publishers; Table 5.1: Sales of Special Education Print and Electronic Media to the U.S. PreK-12 School Market, 2009-2011P; Table 5.2: Implementation Preferences for Equipment and Devices; Table 5.3: Implementation Preferences for Instructional Materials
Chapter 6: Who’s Who: American Education Corp.; AutismPro; Cambium Learning Group; Carnegie Learning; Curriculum Advantage; Curriculum Associates; Digital Directions International; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; McGraw-Hill Education; Mindplay; PCI Education; Pearson Education; Renaissance Learning; Scholastic Education; School Specialty Intervention; Scientific Learning; WestEd